Type 99 No. 80 Mk 5 BombType 5 No. 1 Mk 9 Model 1 and Type 3 No. 6 Mk 9 Bombs
Japanese Explosive Ordnance – Bombs, Bomb Fuzes, Land Mines, Grenades, Firing Devices
and Sabotage Devices
Chapter 1 – Section 2
Japanese Navy Bombs
Type 2 No. 80 Mk 5 and No. 150 Mk 5 Bombs
Type 2 No. 80 Mk 5 No. 150 Mk 5
Fuzes 2 B-2 (b) tail fuzes. 2 large fuzes similar to B-2 (b).
Gaines Special Mk 5. Special Mk 5.
Approximate weight of bomb 1,760 pound. 3,300 pound.
Material of wall Forged steel. Forged steel.
Material of tail Sheet steel. Sheet steel.
Type of filling Type 91. Type 91.
Approximate loading factor 6 percent. 6 percent.

Color and markings: Gray over all with green and brown nose band and white tail struts.

General description: These two bombs were designed to fill the great need of the Ja-panese Navy for armor-piercing bombs. Prior to the design of these two, the Japanese Navy had only one true armor-piercing bomb, the type 99 No. 80 Mk 5, an adaptaton of a large caliber artillery shell produced by turning the shell down to a streamlined shape and adding a tail section and a slightly larger explosive charge. Type 2 No. 80 Mk 5 and No. 150 Mk 5, although they were specifically designed as armor-piercing bombs, differ only slightly from the earlier bomb. Type 2 No. 80 Mk 5 differs from type 99 No. 80 Mk 5 only in having a slightly larger explosive charge, and in having no recesses at the nose to hold a windshield in place. No. 150 Mk 5 is simply a larger version of type 2 No. 80 Mk 5. Both bombs of the No. 80 size use two B-2 (b) fuzes in the tail with the special Mk 5 gaine. No. 150 Mk 5 has two large fuzes of similar construction to the B-2 (b).

These bombs were never extensively produced, and neither type 2 No. 80 Mk 5 or No. 150 Mk 5 was ever outside the Japanese homeland.

The data on these bombs is the result of incomplete investigation, and must not be con-sidered as specific, accurate information.

The Mk 7 bomb was never more than an idea as far as the Japanese Navy was concer-ned. It was suggested and discussed by a meeting of designers in 1935, but no experi-ments were carried out because the idea was considered impractical and unnecessary. The bomb, as planned, was to consist of the 1 kilogram practice bomb, with a conical glass bottle of bacillus culture in place of the smoke mixture in the tail. A lengthened striker was to break the bottle, and the culture was to be spread by the force of impact. A spread of 1 meter diameter was ho-ped for. No specific type of bacillus had been se-lected for the bomb.

Distinctive color markings for the bomb was to have been purple painted nose and tail.

Type 99 No. 80 Mk 5 BombType 5 No. 1 Mk 9 Model 1 and Type 3 No. 6 Mk 9 Bombs